Integrity is a process.
Not a promise of perfection.
CliniPraxi separates draft learning, reviewed teaching, formal assessment and verifiable achievement.
01 / Content governance
Every course needs a named, authorised clinical reviewer, current exact references, a versioned content hash and approved assessment bank before publication. The 180 current courses are unreviewed structured drafts, not ready-to-use clinical curricula.
02 / Authentic learning
Learners must use their own account, submit their own work and acknowledge assessment integrity. Sharing answers, impersonation, plagiarism and misrepresenting AI-assisted work are prohibited. Formative sample questions do not count towards certification.
03 / Controlled assessment
Formal answers are scored on the server against a non-public answer bank. Attempt records bind to the account and course release. Certificates cannot be unlocked by editing browser progress. Question randomisation, specialist item validation, secure identity checks and high-stakes proctoring remain pre-launch requirements.
04 / Verifiable records
Certificates have unguessable codes linked to the course version and assessed attempt. Public verification discloses course, version, issuance date and revocation state, not personal learner data. A copied document is not proof of identity or clinical qualification.
05 / Review and appeals
Suspected misconduct requires evidence, human review and an opportunity to respond. Certificate revocation and appeals handling need a verified governance contact and staff workflow before launch. Automated suspicion alone must not establish fraud.
06 / Honest scope
No platform can guarantee fraud-proof operation. Authentication verifies inbox access, not clinician identity. No recognised CPD accreditation is claimed. Drafts must not be relied upon for patient treatment or used as professional credentials.